User talk:Yann

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
This user is busy in real life and may not respond swiftly to queries.

Bahasa Indonesia  dansk  italiano  sicilianu  Deutsch  euskara  magyar  čeština  português do Brasil  română  español  português  English  français  Nederlands  polski  galego  Simple English  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Tiếng Việt  Türkçe  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  українська  ქართული  հայերեն  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ไทย  မြန်မာဘာသာ  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  العربية  فارسی  +/−

/archives 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52

God is busy, may I help you? / Dieu est occupé, puis-je vous aider?

You can leave me a message in English or French, at the bottom. Click here. Yann 22:13, 30 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Possible problematic uploads

Hi, I noticed that @Maxscheller uploaded many files as "own work", but then credits somebody else as author (e.g. File:Phytoecia (Parobereina) heinzi Lazarev, 2019.jpg). Perhaps you can have a look at it or (I'm less familiar with Commons) point me to where I should take this concern. Thanks! Randykitty (talk) 15:44, 27 July 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I don't see any issue. His is the person credited. Yann (talk) 17:01, 27 July 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
?? As "source" he gives own work and as "author" he lists Maxim Alexandrovich Lazarev (but his userid says he's "Maxscheller"). There's no evidence that Maxschller is Maxim Alexandrovich Lazarev. I'm sorry, but I don't get it. What am I missing? Sorry for being insistent, but I'd like to understand... --Randykitty (talk) 22:00, 27 July 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
User:Maxscheller redirects to Category:Maxim Alexandrovich Lazarev. This is obviously the same person. Yann (talk) 23:10, 27 July 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Yann,
Maxim Alexandrovich Lazarev = Maxscheller, I am in all wiki projects under the same nickname. Maxscheller (talk) 06:26, 28 July 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
All clear, apologies for not checking the userpage myself... Thanks! --Randykitty (talk) 08:05, 28 July 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Recent speedy deletion

Hi! I'm looking at this speedy deletion, but it had been kept on copyright grounds at DR (see: Commons:Deletion requests/File:With Beautiful Actress Simran.jpg). The rationale for the speedy ("no metadata") doesn't seem to be a speedy reason for deletion; that's a reason to have a discussion, but there isn't clear copyvio here. Are you willing to undelete File:With Beautiful Actress Simran.jpg pending further discussion? — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 15:30, 28 July 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

✓ Done Restored. It was tagged as copyvio by a new user, and I didn't check. Yann (talk) 20:02, 28 July 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Recent speedy deletion 2

Hi Yann! I'm looking for the reason of this speedy deletion Can it be undone or can you upload a new file instead (if possible)? — AKSHADĒV™ 💬 09:43, 29 July 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@Akshadev: This is a copyright violation. We need a permission from the copyright holder for a free license. Yann (talk) 10:33, 29 July 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

User:To The Beauty Within

This user is uploading images from Facebook and other websites which is against Wikipedia copyright policy and using in English Wikipedia articles. Please remove them. They are as follows

45.64.17.3 12:37, 29 July 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The user has again uploaded image from Facebook. See File:Soumitrisha.jpg 45.64.17.3 14:58, 29 July 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Brouillon

Bonjour,

J'aurais besoin de faire des essais sur une image (image quelconque, ce n'est pas le sujet de l'image qui serait objet de l'essai, un rectangle blanc ou vert suffirait), sais-tu s'il est possible d'avoir une image comme sous-page utilisateur ? Si oui, comment créer cette sous-page utilisateur, je dois télécharger mon image quelconque puis demander son renommage comme sous-page ? O.Taris (talk) 08:24, 30 July 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@O.Taris: Non, une image ne peut pas être une sous-page. Tu peux créer une page de test en sous-page comme ceci : User:O.Taris/test. Cordialement, Yann (talk) 11:44, 30 July 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
OK, merci, je vais me débrouiller au mieux. O.Taris (talk) 19:38, 30 July 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Auguste Cartault

This Wikimedia Commons item [[1]] has the name Augustin, but on French Wikipedia he is Auguste. Is there an error? Kanjuzi (talk) 17:59, 30 July 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@Kanjuzi: Hmm. Son acte de décès donne Augustin. Il faudrait vérifier l'acte de naissance. Augustin est peut-être un diminutif.
His death certificate gives Augustin. His birth certificate should be checked. Augustin may be a nickname. Yann (talk) 18:10, 30 July 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Oui, je pense que vous avez raison. Tous ses livres vendus par Amazon n'ont que le nom Augustin. J'écrirai Augustin dans mon article sur Sulpicia. Kanjuzi (talk) 06:36, 31 July 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

(Three) undeleted files

Hey, I saw you have undeleted 16 files. You asked me to add {{Information}} to them, and I have done so to 13 of them.

There are, nevertheless, three files whose exact source I cannot find, probably because they are the ones not loading here and here. Should we assume good-faith from the uploader or mark them as No source? (They were uploaded almost 18 years ago!)

Regards, RodRabelo7 (talk) 23:22, 30 July 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@RodRabelo7: Hi, I don't think there isn't any worry about the license.
Did you try searching the image with Google/TinEye? Did you try the Internet Archive? Yann (talk) 07:41, 31 July 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Mazum24

Back again, this time with Cutlerys (talk contribs Luxo's SUL deleted contribs logs block user block log ) CutlassCiera 01:12, 31 July 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

✓ Done Blocked. Yann (talk) 07:49, 31 July 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Question about your proposal

Hi. Do you happen to know what the status of your Proposal to allow old orphan works is? I was thinking about requesting it be closed since I have old photographs I'd like to upload and there seems to be a consensus to approve it. Plus it's been open for quit awhile without further comments. I don't want to do either one if I'm just reading it wrong and it really failed or something though. Thanks. Adamant1 (talk) 11:08, 31 July 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@Adamant1: I was looking for someone else to close it, but since nobody cares I will close it myself. Now we need a template reflecting the decision. Can you help with that? Yann (talk) 16:42, 31 July 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Awesome. Unfortunately I have no idea how templates work. So I can't really help you there. Sorry. --Adamant1 (talk) 19:31, 31 July 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Vesouleries

Bonjour, Merci de créer une ou plusieurs demandes de suppression, en informant l'utilisateur. De nos jours, tout le monde peut prendre des photos avec un drone. Donc "photo aérienne" n'est pas une justification suffisante pour une suppression immédiate. Yann (talk) 16:40, 29 July 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@ Yann vraiment incroyable de lire un tel commentaire ! Je n'ai JAMAIS utilisé l'unique argument qu'il s'agit d'une "vue aérienne" puisque vous semblez ne pas comprendre l'anglais, je vais donc traduire :
  • "unsimilar to the other pitctures of this user take in the ground" [FR : différent des autres images prisent au sol par l'utilisateur en question] (sous entendu les images prises au sol dont de qualité correcte et en haute définition alors que les images aériennes sont de très faible définition et souvent pixélisées).
  • "poor quality from Google image" [FR : qualité médiocre issu de Google image] (rejoint l'argument ci-dessus)
  • "printed image take by smartphone (see the color point composed the picture)" [FR : image imprimée prise avec smartphone (regardez les points de couleur qui composent l'image)] on a en plus des exif des photo de smartphone, vous avez déjà vu un téléphone voler ? Et ne me sortez pas l'augment de l'aéronef, il s'agit de photo ultra zoomées et prise parfaitement à la verticale, de plus on voit clairement qu'il s'agit d'une photo imprimé avec les point d'impression.
  • "ILEGAL to broadcast aerial footage of an activ jail !" (FR : il est illégale de diffusé une vue aérienne d'une prison active ! Et oui, Google maps et le Géoportail n'on pas le droit de diffuser de vue aérienne des prisons mais visiblement vous êtes ok pour diffuser cela sur Commons et Wikipédia, aucun problème !
Ces photos n'ont aucun liens esthétiques et techniques entres elles. C'est symptomatique du copyvio, on vole des images fantômes de base qualité sur Google image et on reprend avec son téléphone des vues aériennes anciennes affichées en mairie où dans un quelconque lieu publique, vous n'avez aucune perspicacité pour détecter ça ?
Enfin et pour couronner le tout, toutes ces images sont en lien avec Vesoul et ont été mises en ligne par de multiples compte éphémères ! Et pourquoi ? Parce qu'ils ont tous été bloqués sur Wikipédia. Tous ces comptes sont les faux-nez d'un même individu qui a été banni pour ses nombreux copyvio, des copier-coller textuels d'internet sont modifier une seule virgule ! Et AUSSI des photos !
VOIR : fr:Wikipédia:Faux-nez/PiedgauchedeZidane
ET fr:Wikipédia:Bulletin_des_administrateurs/2013/Semaine_7#Vesouleries
Mais bon puisque l'on ne peut pas travailler ici, je fait en discuter avec les administrateurs de Wikipédia qui connaissent l'affaire et prennent les choses au sérieux. Nous pourrons peut-êtres trouver les solutions adaptées à cette problématique là-bas. Merci pour la perte de temps et le soutiens aux délinquants en tout cas !

A.BourgeoisP (talk) 11:28, 1 August 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Il faudrait descendre de votre cheval, et vous calmer. Yann (talk) 11:40, 1 August 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Deletion of: Closing discussions without all users participated

Yann, while I certainly appreciate the spirit in which you deleted this silly comment -- how can "all Wikimedia users participate[d]", when I see a change to my talk page, I just pull up the history to see what the change was, which takes longer than simply reading the post and deleting it myself. Regards, .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:16, 1 August 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

OK, sorry. Since I blocked this IP for vandalism elsewhere, I thought it better to also revert the post on your talk page. Yann (talk) 14:15, 1 August 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Something I meant to ask you earlier...

Why exactly is it disruptive to "solicit proxy edits on one's behalf on [another project which I won't name] through Commons" (as Surjection wrote here)? See, the proxy-edit-soliciting was done simply so that I would feel less of an urge to block-evade.
So why would he (Surjection) find that part disruptive, especially when I never asked him to make those proxy edits? I'd ask Surjection but he and Fish bowl seem to think everything I ask them is "pestering", even when I don't mean it that way. Shāntián Tàiláng (talk) 20:18, 1 August 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Quick reminder: Commons Photographers meeting this Saturday

Dear member of the Commons Photographers User Group,

This is a quick reminder that our next meeting will happen on Saturday, August 5th. If you haven't registered yet and you're interested in learning more about underwater photography and “Flickypedia”, please sign up on this page. Also, I invite you to fill out this survey created by the people who are working on the Flickr-to-Wikimedia Commons software. Your input will make a difference.

We haven't had a virtual meeting in a while and I'm so looking forward to this weekend!

All the best, --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 02:15, 4 August 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

A file you uploaded is on the main page!

File:Whatmenliveby 01 tolstoy.mp3, that you uploaded, is on the main page today. Thank you for your contributions to this project.

//EatchaBot (talk) 00:02, 5 August 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hey, Yann! Just wanted to let you know I fixed a few more bits of damage on this. Better to say than to keep silent, aye? Adam Cuerden (talk) 11:32, 5 August 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

A file you uploaded is on the main page!

File:300 ans des Lettres Persanes - La tolérance face aux mouvements woke et à la cancel culture.webm, that you uploaded, is on the main page today. Thank you for your contributions to this project.

//EatchaBot (talk) 00:01, 7 August 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

A file you uploaded is on the main page!

File:Hogwarts Legacy – Official 4K Reveal Trailer.webm, that you uploaded, is on the main page today. Thank you for your contributions to this project.

//EatchaBot (talk) 00:01, 8 August 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

 You are invited to join the discussion at COM:VPC#PD-US-1978-89 for murals?. -- Marchjuly (talk) 12:24, 9 August 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi Yann. I'm wondering if you'd mind taking a look at this because you actually reviewed the Flickr license for File:Trains mural.jpg and marked it as "OK". I don't dispute that; I'm just not sure if the Flickr license also covers the mural shown in the photo. -- Marchjuly (talk) 12:27, 9 August 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Import d'une photo de statue

Bonjour, comme vous êtes le seul administrateur francophone dont je me souviens sur Commons, je m'adresse à vous. Tout à l'heure j'aurais souhaité importer la photo d'une statue de François Rabelais, apparemment créée par Henri Dumaigne en 1880, et qui se trouve sur la voie publique. Mais je me suis souvenue aussi qu'il n'y avait pas de liberté de panorama en France, et je ne connais pas bien la législation sur ces questions. Aurais-je le droit d'importer la photo ? J'ai aussi importé une photo sur laquelle on voit des bâtiments, est-ce autorisé ? (Je suppose que peut-être seuls les bâtiments architecturaux se démarquant par l'empreinte de leur auteur sont soumis à une interdiction de reproduction...) Dans l'attente de votre réponse, cordialement. Olga Rithme (talk) 15:37, 10 August 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@Olga Rithme: Bonjour,
Comme Henri Dumaigne est mort en 1888, il n'y aucun souci pour importer des images de ses oeuvres sur Commons. Pas de problème non plus pour la photo mentionnée ci-dessus. Cordialement, Yann (talk) 15:45, 10 August 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
D'accord, c'est ce que j'avais envisagé mais je préférais demander n'étant pas bien sûre... Merci et bonne fin de semaine. Olga Rithme (talk) 15:48, 10 August 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Deleted photo of Jennie Kim at Met Gala

Hello! I don't understand why you deleted about 10 minutes after someone nominated to for speedy deletion. I wanted to make an appeal for that. Kalisidina (talk) 15:49, 10 August 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@Kalisidina: This is an obvious copyright violation, so it meets the criteria for speedy deletion. Everything on the Internet is under a copyright unless there is a mention of a free license. Please read COM:L. Yann (talk) 15:52, 10 August 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
I relied on photos like this File:Jennie Kim for Marie Claire Korea Magazine on October 9, 2018 (5).png. It is the same but they were still approved. Kalisidina (talk) 15:55, 10 August 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
@Kalisidina: This one has a free license at the source. Yann (talk) 16:00, 10 August 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
I also made a screenshot btw. Kalisidina (talk) 16:04, 10 August 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
@Kalisidina: It doesn't matter. Your file is a derivative work. Yann (talk) 16:07, 10 August 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
@Yann But that file is not a derivative work because it was made in movement? I have read what you sent and still didn't understand logic. Kalisidina (talk) 16:11, 10 August 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
@Kalisidina: Yes, your file is a derivative work of the video. Since you are not the author of the video, and it is not under a free license, you are not allowed to upload a screenshot of this video to Commons. Yann (talk) 22:55, 10 August 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]