User talk:Wasiul Bahar

Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Wasiul Bahar!

First steps tutorial Our first steps tour and our frequently asked questions will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy (Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content). You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold when contributing and assume good faith when interacting with others. This is a wiki. Getting help More information is available at the community portal. You may ask questions at the help desk, village pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (webchat). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at the copyright village pump.

Goodies, tips, and tricks Put Babel boxes on your user page so others know what languages you can speak and indicate your graphic abilities. You can find the files you have uploaded in your Uploads. Please sign your name on Talk pages by typing ~~~~. To link to an image page without embedding the image, type: [[:File:Foo.jpg]], which produces: File:Foo.jpg. You may enable gadgets (custom features) for your account. There are several tools to upload files. Have you edited Wikipedia before? This guide might be useful. Made a mistake? Do you want to have a file renamed or moved? Use the move link and wait for an authorized user to rename it. Do you want to have your recently uploaded picture removed? Tag it as {{speedy|reason here}}. For more information read the deletion guidelines.

-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 03:49, 15 December 2019 (UTC)

Only two Nominations

Please, you can just add two nominations on Featured Pictures Candidates. Wilfredor (talk) 19:49, 5 September 2022 (UTC)

@Wilfredor Thanks for mentioning. I will remember this in future. Wasiul Bahar (talk) 19:57, 5 September 2022 (UTC)

I let you a note in each nomination too Wilfredor (talk) 20:04, 5 September 2022 (UTC)

@Wilfredor Should I try again after the two active nomination ended? Wasiul Bahar (talk) 20:03, 5 September 2022 (UTC)

Also please read carefully Commons:Featured picture candidates. Thanks, Yann (talk) 20:10, 5 September 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cat in Notre Dame college.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 2 October 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! সিরিয়ার দেবশিশু ০১.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 13 October 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! One of the last captivated Dolphins of Canada.1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 19:53, 6 November 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! One of the last captivated Dolphins of Canada.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 19:53, 6 November 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 9 November 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! One of the last captivated Dolphins of Canada.37.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Yeriho 19:58, 16 November 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 19 November 2022 (UTC)

File:Dhaka Railway Station VIP Gate.jpg

File:Dhaka Railway Station VIP Gate.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 00:44, 7 December 2022 (UTC)

Question from the CPUG Board

Dear user group member,

I'm writing you to today on behalf of the board of the Commons Photographers User Group. The past year has been a busy one for us. In 2022, we've had more activities than ever before in the history of our group and you'll find an overview on our group's page.

With that being said, 2022 was also a year of learning for the current board members. Most of us hadn't been involved in running the Photographers User Group and we spent quite some time on getting used to our new roles. We all feel it was a steep learning curve.

That's why, at our last board meeting, we decided to ask our members whether they'd be ok with us serving for another year. Extending our board duties to the end of 2023 would allow us to continue the work we've started this year, and to benefit from the knowledge we've built over the past twelve months.

However, in the end, it's up to you and the other members of our group to decide whether such an extension of our board term should be granted. I invite you to voice your opinion on this page:

Commons:Commons Photographers User Group/Board Elections 2022

We'll gather feedback until December 27, and we'll keep you in the loop about the outcomes of this process.

Thanks so much for your ongoing support of our group. I wish you, your family, and your friends all the best.

--Ailura (talk) 12:32, 11 December 2022 (UTC)

QI reviews

Thank you for reviewing some of the images I nominated. I am a bit confused however, that you are asking for a "Wow-factor" for one image, when this is explicitly something that is needed for FI and not for QI. Similarily I am not sure an "ordinary setup" should be considered grounds for rejecting an image as QI. Could I ask you to please reread the image guidelines and reconsider your votes accordingly? Thank you very much, Kritzolina (talk) 19:55, 13 December 2022 (UTC)

Hello @Kritzolina

Thanks for reaching to me about that. I have rechecked those and have updated some votes. Please let me know if there is any other problems. Wasiul Bahar (talk) 20:22, 13 December 2022 (UTC)

Thanks for checking the guidelines and changing your votes accordingly. I know I am being a bit testy now, but could you look into it a bit more and change "decline" to "review" when you change your actual vote from decline to neutral? Also please check the Megapixels and not the Megabytes, thank you. --Kritzolina (talk) 13:52, 14 December 2022 (UTC)

Most memorable shot 2022 / Wikimania 2023

Dear member of the Commons Photographers User Group,

I wish you a Happy New Year! As it has been our tradition at the beginning of the new year for a while, we're sharing our most memorable shots of the past year with each other. I invite you to share a picture that is particular meaningful to you and to describe why that's the case. Also, as Wikimania 2023 will be here before we know it (August 16 to 19), please consider adding your thoughts on our planning page, where we gather ideas for how we can make Commons photography more visible than in the years before.

All the best to you, your family, and friends! --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 21:01, 2 January 2023 (UTC)

File:Memorandum at Bangladesh Agricultural University(BAU).jpg

File:Memorandum at Bangladesh Agricultural University(BAU).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Túrelio (talk) 11:36, 13 January 2023 (UTC)

Warning

Hi, You may be blocked if you abuse multiple accounts. Yann (talk) 19:10, 24 January 2023 (UTC)

Hello @yann

why do you think that I am abusing multiple account?

Me, my brother and 2 of my friends live in the same place. Me and my brother always use the same pc and we, sometimes share pcs among us. Just for example, in this image, me, my brother and one of my friends, mong is using my pc to complete the organizers' lab course; me and my brother was helping him out in his tasks. You can reach out to the leads or organizers'lab to get proofs of mong's identity.If any kind of proof of our real life identity is needed, we are always ready to provide that. P.S.- you'll find me, my brother and mong in this and this image also.--Wasiul Bahar(talk) 19:57, 24 January 2023 (UTC)

See Commons:Requests for checkuser#Wasiul Bahar. Yann (talk) 21:34, 24 January 2023 (UTC)

Your account has been blocked

You have been blocked from editing Commons. The reason for the block is available in the block log as is the name of the administrator who blocked you. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may add {{Unblock}} below this message explaining clearly why you should be unblocked. For more information, see Appealing a block.

Эlcobbola _talk 15:04, 25 January 2023 (UTC)

Hi, You can request unblocking here. Yann (talk) 10:46, 26 January 2023 (UTC)

I have unblocked you, as per information I received by email. I believe you are in good faith, and the votes on FMC are newbies' mistakes. I suggest you avoid voting for each other's nominations in the future. Yann (talk) 21:25, 26 January 2023 (UTC)

@Yann Thanks a lot for your kind consideration. In future I will be more careful with the COI issues which was confused with meatpuppetry. Wasiul Bahar (talk) 06:18, 27 January 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cute little boy on book fair.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Der Angemeldete 19:36, 6 February 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 9 February 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Street photography in bookfair 2023,Dhaka 21.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Der Angemeldete 21:08, 10 February 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 13 February 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! CUET Canteen 3 front window wall painting 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Fabian Roudra Baroi 19:27, 12 February 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 15 February 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fairmont Le Château Frontenac, Quebec 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 18:56, 14 February 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 17 February 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Emergency road barrier 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Please, enter at least one category about what we see here --Poco a poco 20:27, 16 February 2023 (UTC) @Poco a poco Done-- Wasiul Bahar 16:35, 17 February 2023 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:50, 18 February 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 21 February 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Java apple 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Add proper categories --Fabian Roudra Baroi 17:06, 18 February 2023 (UTC) @Fabian Roudra Baroi Done.  Support Good quality. --Fabian Roudra Baroi 21:20, 20 February 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 23 February 2023 (UTC)

File:National Museum of Science and Technology 7.jpg

File:National Museum of Science and Technology 7.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

—MdsShakil (talk) 07:57, 3 March 2023 (UTC)

File:National Museum of Science and Technology 6.jpg

File:National Museum of Science and Technology 6.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

—MdsShakil (talk) 07:57, 3 March 2023 (UTC)

MOTD Notification

⭐ A file you uploaded is on the main page! ⭐ File:Beauty lachchi.webm, that you uploaded, is on the main page today. Thank you for your contributions to this project.

//EatchaBot (talk) 00:01, 5 March 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Abandoned lock at Burdhwan House, bangla academy.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 04:48, 8 March 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Abandoned bus in Bangladesh Shishu Academy 14.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:49, 7 March 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 10 March 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bangladesh Police Armored Vehicle 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 16:23, 7 March 2023 (UTC) Can you please turn down the highlights a bit also increase the sharpness? --Fabian Roudra Baroi 20:46, 7 March 2023 (UTC) @Fabian Roudra Baroi Thanks for the suggestion. I tried to correct the sharpness and light. Is it okay now? --Wasiul Bahar 07:03, 8 March 2023 (UTC)  Support Good job it's much better. --Fabian Roudra Baroi 16:23, 8 March 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 11 March 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sculpture of begum rokeya at Burdhwan House, bangla academy 5.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --痛 02:35, 10 March 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 12 March 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Abandoned bus in Bangladesh Shishu Academy 16.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Cr7Carlos 23:45, 10 March 2023 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Cr7Carlos 23:51, 10 March 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 13 March 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Graffiti in malibag-mogbazar flyover 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment Please add category. --Rjcastillo 19:30, 15 April 2023 (UTC) Rjcastillo Done.--Wasiul Bahar 19:54, 15 April 2023 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 20:06, 15 April 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 18 April 2023 (UTC)

Round 1 of Picture of the Year 2022 voting is open!

2022 Picture of the Year: Saint John Church of Sohrol in Iran.

Read this message in your language

Dear Wikimedian,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the 2022 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the seventeenth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2022) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year are all entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

For your convenience, we have sorted the images into topical categories. Two rounds of voting will be held: In the first round, you may vote for as many images as you like. The top 30 overall and the two most popular images in each category will continue to the final. In the final round, you may vote for just three images to become the Picture of the Year.

Round 1 will end on 1 May 2023, 23:59:59 UTC.

Click here to vote now!

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee

You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2021 Picture of the Year contest.

Delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 09:16, 20 April 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Seagulls at Downsview Park 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:07, 31 May 2023 (UTC) should be identified --Charlesjsharp 16:56, 31 May 2023 (UTC)@Charlesjsharp: Description and Category updated. --Fabian Roudra Baroi 04:13, 1 June 2023 (UTC)  Support Good point, QI now --Poco a poco 17:07, 1 June 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Seagulls at Downsview Park 10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:07, 31 May 2023 (UTC) should be identified --Charlesjsharp 16:56, 31 May 2023 (UTC)@Charlesjsharp: Description and Category updated. --Fabian Roudra Baroi 04:13, 1 June 2023 (UTC)  Support Good point, QI now --Poco a poco 17:07, 1 June 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 4 June 2023 (UTC)

File tagging File:Wikimedia Vibrance Panel Discussion at WCI 2023 Day-2 2.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Wikimedia Vibrance Panel Discussion at WCI 2023 Day-2 2.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case. Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). Warning: unless the permission information is given, the file may be deleted after seven days. Thank you.

 

~Moheen ^{(keep talking)} 12:44, 4 June 2023 (UTC)

File tagging File:Front page of Thakumar Jhuli.jpg

This media was probably deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Front page of Thakumar Jhuli.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case. Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Front page of Thakumar Jhuli.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

 

~Moheen ^{(keep talking)} 13:22, 4 June 2023 (UTC)

File tagging File:Front page of Joy pocket Dictionary.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Front page of Joy pocket Dictionary.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case. Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). Warning: unless the permission information is given, the file may be deleted after seven days. Thank you.

 

~Moheen ^{(keep talking)} 13:22, 4 June 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tahrir Square.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --MB-one 17:25, 2 June 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 5 June 2023 (UTC)

File tagging File:ওয়াসি উল বাহার.jpeg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:ওয়াসি উল বাহার.jpeg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case. Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). Warning: unless the permission information is given, the file may be deleted after seven days. Thank you.

 

~Moheen ^{(keep talking)} 07:13, 9 June 2023 (UTC)

Source of derivative work is not properly indicated: File:Image of Mosque of Bibi Mariam.jpg

This file may be deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Image of Mosque of Bibi Mariam.jpg, is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such works would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a map that has been altered from the original. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work. While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the original content yourself, enter this information as the source. If someone else created the content, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

 

~Moheen ^{(keep talking)} 07:24, 9 June 2023 (UTC)

File tagging File:Wasiul Bahar with AAFI at WCI 2023 Day-2 2.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Wasiul Bahar with AAFI at WCI 2023 Day-2 2.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case. Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). Warning: unless the permission information is given, the file may be deleted after seven days. Thank you.

 

Anup Sadi (talk) 07:26, 9 June 2023 (UTC)

File tagging File:Wasiul Bahar with AAFI at WCI 2023 Day-2.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Wasiul Bahar with AAFI at WCI 2023 Day-2.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case. Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). Warning: unless the permission information is given, the file may be deleted after seven days. Thank you.

 

Anup Sadi (talk) 07:27, 9 June 2023 (UTC)

File tagging File:Wasiul Bahar with Christel Steigenberger at WCI 2023 Day-2.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Wasiul Bahar with Christel Steigenberger at WCI 2023 Day-2.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case. Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). Warning: unless the permission information is given, the file may be deleted after seven days. Thank you.

 

Anup Sadi (talk) 07:28, 9 June 2023 (UTC)

File tagging File:Kashmiri Wikipedian at WCI 2023 Day-2 4.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Kashmiri Wikipedian at WCI 2023 Day-2 4.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case. Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). Warning: unless the permission information is given, the file may be deleted after seven days. Thank you.

 

Anup Sadi (talk) 07:29, 9 June 2023 (UTC)

File tagging File:Kashmiri Wikipedian at WCI 2023 Day-2 3.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Kashmiri Wikipedian at WCI 2023 Day-2 3.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case. Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). Warning: unless the permission information is given, the file may be deleted after seven days. Thank you.

 

Anup Sadi (talk) 07:29, 9 June 2023 (UTC)

File:Wasiul Bahar with AAFI at WCI 2023 Day-2 2.jpg

File:Wasiul Bahar with AAFI at WCI 2023 Day-2 2.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

~Moheen ^{(keep talking)} 12:50, 9 June 2023 (UTC)

File:Wasiul Bahar with AAFI at WCI 2023 Day-2.jpg

File:Wasiul Bahar with AAFI at WCI 2023 Day-2.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

~Moheen ^{(keep talking)} 12:51, 9 June 2023 (UTC)

File:Wasiul Bahar with Christel Steigenberger at WCI 2023 Day-2.jpg

File:Wasiul Bahar with Christel Steigenberger at WCI 2023 Day-2.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

~Moheen ^{(keep talking)} 12:53, 9 June 2023 (UTC)

File:Kashmiri Wikipedian at WCI 2023 Day-2 4.jpg

File:Kashmiri Wikipedian at WCI 2023 Day-2 4.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

~Moheen ^{(keep talking)} 12:53, 9 June 2023 (UTC)

File:Kashmiri Wikipedian at WCI 2023 Day-2 3.jpg

File:Kashmiri Wikipedian at WCI 2023 Day-2 3.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

~Moheen ^{(keep talking)} 12:53, 9 June 2023 (UTC)

File:Wasiul Bahar and Gurtej S Chauhan at WCI 2023 Day-2.jpg

File:Wasiul Bahar and Gurtej S Chauhan at WCI 2023 Day-2.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

~Moheen ^{(keep talking)} 12:53, 9 June 2023 (UTC)

File:Wikimedia Vibrance Panel Discussion at WCI 2023 Day-2 18.jpg

File:Wikimedia Vibrance Panel Discussion at WCI 2023 Day-2 18.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

~Moheen ^{(keep talking)} 12:54, 9 June 2023 (UTC)

File:Wikimedia Vibrance Panel Discussion at WCI 2023 Day-2 15.jpg

File:Wikimedia Vibrance Panel Discussion at WCI 2023 Day-2 15.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

~Moheen ^{(keep talking)} 12:55, 9 June 2023 (UTC)

File:Wikimedia Vibrance Panel Discussion at WCI 2023 Day-2 8.jpg

File:Wikimedia Vibrance Panel Discussion at WCI 2023 Day-2 8.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

~Moheen ^{(keep talking)} 12:55, 9 June 2023 (UTC)

File:Wikimedia Vibrance Panel Discussion at WCI 2023 Day-2 7.jpg

File:Wikimedia Vibrance Panel Discussion at WCI 2023 Day-2 7.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

~Moheen ^{(keep talking)} 12:55, 9 June 2023 (UTC)

File:Wikimedia Vibrance Panel Discussion at WCI 2023 Day-2 6.jpg

File:Wikimedia Vibrance Panel Discussion at WCI 2023 Day-2 6.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

~Moheen ^{(keep talking)} 12:55, 9 June 2023 (UTC)

File:Wikimedia Vibrance Panel Discussion at WCI 2023 Day-2 5.jpg

File:Wikimedia Vibrance Panel Discussion at WCI 2023 Day-2 5.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

~Moheen ^{(keep talking)} 12:56, 9 June 2023 (UTC)

File:Wikimedia Vibrance Panel Discussion at WCI 2023 Day-2 4.jpg

File:Wikimedia Vibrance Panel Discussion at WCI 2023 Day-2 4.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

~Moheen ^{(keep talking)} 12:56, 9 June 2023 (UTC)

File:Wikimedia Vibrance Panel Discussion at WCI 2023 Day-2 2.jpg

File:Wikimedia Vibrance Panel Discussion at WCI 2023 Day-2 2.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

~Moheen ^{(keep talking)} 12:56, 9 June 2023 (UTC)

File:Wikimedia Vibrance Panel Discussion at WCI 2023 Day-2.jpg

File:Wikimedia Vibrance Panel Discussion at WCI 2023 Day-2.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

~Moheen ^{(keep talking)} 12:56, 9 June 2023 (UTC)

File:Nizil and Wasiul Bahar at WCI 2023 Day-2.jpg

File:Nizil and Wasiul Bahar at WCI 2023 Day-2.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

~Moheen ^{(keep talking)} 12:56, 9 June 2023 (UTC)

File:Wasiul bahar with Kashmiri wikipedians at WCI 2023 Day-1.jpg

File:Wasiul bahar with Kashmiri wikipedians at WCI 2023 Day-1.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

~Moheen ^{(keep talking)} 13:00, 9 June 2023 (UTC)

File:Wasiul bahar with Kashmiri wikipedians at WCI 2023 Day-1 2.jpg

File:Wasiul bahar with Kashmiri wikipedians at WCI 2023 Day-1 2.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

~Moheen ^{(keep talking)} 13:01, 9 June 2023 (UTC)

File:Sumit Surai at WCI 2023 Day-2 6.jpg

File:Sumit Surai at WCI 2023 Day-2 6.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that. The file you added may soon be deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please replace the copyvio tag with {{subst:OP}} and have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you disagree that the file is a copyright violation for any other reason, please replace the copyvio tag with a regular deletion request. This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: when the photo was taken the uploader was present on the stage. The photo was taken by someone else, the uploader which violates the photographer's copyright. For reference, see this photo: File:Wikimedia Vibrance Panel Discussion at WCI 2023 Day-2 17.jpg Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

 

Rocky Masum (talk) 15:17, 9 June 2023 (UTC)

File:Wikimedia Vibrance Panel Discussion at WCI 2023 Day-2 17.jpg

File:Wikimedia Vibrance Panel Discussion at WCI 2023 Day-2 17.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that. The file you added may soon be deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please replace the copyvio tag with {{subst:OP}} and have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you disagree that the file is a copyright violation for any other reason, please replace the copyvio tag with a regular deletion request. This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: The author/uploader of this image is himself present in the image. The photo was taken by someone else, which violates the photographer's copyright. Permission missing from the original photographer. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

 

Rocky Masum (talk) 15:18, 9 June 2023 (UTC)

File:Wikimedia Vibrance Panel Discussion at WCI 2023 Day-2 19.jpg

File:Wikimedia Vibrance Panel Discussion at WCI 2023 Day-2 19.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that. The file you added may soon be deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please replace the copyvio tag with {{subst:OP}} and have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you disagree that the file is a copyright violation for any other reason, please replace the copyvio tag with a regular deletion request. This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: The author/uploader of this image is himself present in the image. The photo was taken by someone else, which violates the photographer's copyright. Permission missing from the original photographer. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

 

Rocky Masum (talk) 15:19, 9 June 2023 (UTC)

File:Wikimedia Vibrance Panel Discussion at WCI 2023 Day-2 16.jpg

File:Wikimedia Vibrance Panel Discussion at WCI 2023 Day-2 16.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Rocky Masum (talk) 15:22, 9 June 2023 (UTC)

File:Wikimedia Vibrance Panel Discussion at WCI 2023 Day-2 14.jpg

File:Wikimedia Vibrance Panel Discussion at WCI 2023 Day-2 14.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that. The file you added may soon be deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please replace the copyvio tag with {{subst:OP}} and have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you disagree that the file is a copyright violation for any other reason, please replace the copyvio tag with a regular deletion request. This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: When the photo was taken the uploader was present on the stage and this photo clicked by someone else, the uploader violates the photographer's copyright as well as permission missing from the original photographer. For reference, see this photo: File:Wikimedia Vibrance Panel Discussion at WCI 2023 Day-2 17.jpg Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

 

Rocky Masum (talk) 15:23, 9 June 2023 (UTC)

File:Wikimedia Vibrance Panel Discussion at WCI 2023 Day-2 13.jpg

File:Wikimedia Vibrance Panel Discussion at WCI 2023 Day-2 13.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that. The file you added may soon be deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please replace the copyvio tag with {{subst:OP}} and have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you disagree that the file is a copyright violation for any other reason, please replace the copyvio tag with a regular deletion request. This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: When the photo was taken the uploader was present on the stage and this photo clicked by someone else, the uploader violates the photographer's copyright as well as permission missing from the original photographer. For reference, see this photo: File:Wikimedia Vibrance Panel Discussion at WCI 2023 Day-2 17.jpg Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

 

Rocky Masum (talk) 15:24, 9 June 2023 (UTC)

File:Wikimedia Vibrance Panel Discussion at WCI 2023 Day-2 2.jpg

File:Wikimedia Vibrance Panel Discussion at WCI 2023 Day-2 2.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that. The file you added may soon be deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please replace the copyvio tag with {{subst:OP}} and have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you disagree that the file is a copyright violation for any other reason, please replace the copyvio tag with a regular deletion request. This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: The author/uploader of this image is himself present in the image. The photo was taken by someone else, which violates the photographer's copyright. Permission missing from the original photographer. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

 

Rocky Masum (talk) 15:25, 9 June 2023 (UTC)

File:Front page of Joy pocket Dictionary.jpg

File:Front page of Joy pocket Dictionary.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

~Moheen ^{(keep talking)} 10:06, 10 June 2023 (UTC)

File:Front page of Thakumar Jhuli.jpg

File:Front page of Thakumar Jhuli.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

~Moheen ^{(keep talking)} 10:08, 10 June 2023 (UTC)

Welcome, Dear Filemover!

---

Hi Wasiul Bahar, you're now a filemover. When moving files please respect the following advice:

• Use the CommonsDelinker link in the {{Rename}} template to order a bot to replace all ocurrences of the old title with the new one. Or, if there was no rename-request, please use the Move & Replace-tab.
• Please leave a redirect behind unless you have a valid reason not to do so. Other projects, including those using InstantCommons, might be using the file even though they don't show up in the global usage. Deleting the redirects would break their file references. Please see this section of the file rename guideline for more information.
• Please know and follow the file rename guidelines.

—‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 20:58, 10 June 2023 (UTC)

File:Wikimedia Vibrance Panel Discussion at WCI 2023 Day-2 2.jpg

File:Wikimedia Vibrance Panel Discussion at WCI 2023 Day-2 2.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

— Red-tailed hawk _(nest) 21:55, 12 June 2023 (UTC)

File:Poster at ekushe boimela 2023.jpg

File:Poster at ekushe boimela 2023.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

A1Cafel (talk) 02:21, 18 June 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nilufar heights, Gulshan 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Moroder 07:08, 19 June 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 22 June 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dibir Haor Tomb.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Funny motif, just good enough quality. --Palauenc05 02:44, 29 June 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 1 July 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Workday at Tanguar Haor.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 20:55, 30 June 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 3 July 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tanguar Haor Houseboat.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 7 July 2023 (UTC)

Please mark yourself as nominator, when nominating pictures of others on QIC

Hi Wasiul, I just came across your nomination here, which look like you took the picture ... until one clicks at the picture and notices another uploader. Please mark clearly, who took the image and that your role ist the one of nominator when you nominate images of others, please! Kritzolina (talk) 19:01, 10 July 2023 (UTC)

Hello @Kritzolina

I appreciate you bringing up this concern. To clarify, I use QI nominator tool for image nominations, which automates the process by generating descriptions and inserting them into the nomination page. I have noticed that there are others who employ a similar approach. Wasiul Bahar (talk) 19:58, 10 July 2023 (UTC)

If you do this, you should still modify the bot generated text to clearly mark who created the image. Everything else is not transparent. Kritzolina (talk) 20:06, 10 July 2023 (UTC)

Okk, thanks :")

I will keep that in mind.

Actually I also feel guilty when the QIC bot post the QI promotion in my talkpage saying that my image (which is not my image, I was just the nominator.) has been promoted to QI. I don't know if there is any way to stop that. :) Wasiul Bahar (talk) 20:16, 10 July 2023 (UTC)

Yes, it is kind of deceiving. Marking the photographer will solve this issue. As far as I remember the tool adds by [[User:XYZ]] anyways, and that is the person who will get the notification. I don't know why this doesn't happen with your nominations. But just look at other nominations that are done by third persons. Kritzolina (talk) 20:26, 10 July 2023 (UTC)

Thanks a lot for the suggestion. I will try adding by [[User:XYZ]] while nominating with QInominator tool. If it don't work, I will try nominating manually. Wasiul Bahar (talk) 10:21, 11 July 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lovachara.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good enough --Grunpfnul 06:57, 8 July 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 11 July 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ratargul Trees 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Luda.slominska 11:05, 9 July 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 12 July 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! I love murti.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:26, 10 July 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mannequin Doll, Dhaka, Bangladesh.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality, but needs categories --Mike Peel 22:33, 6 July 2023 (UTC) I see sufficient categories now, supporting --Kritzolina 18:53, 10 July 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 13 July 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bus at Hyatt Hyderabad Gachibowli.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments A black triangle artifact in the top-left corner after image rotation. Chromatic aberrations on the front of the bus --Jakubhal 13:37, 16 July 2023 (UTC) @Jakubhal corrected. Is it ok now?  Support Ok --Jakubhal 19:04, 17 July 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 20 July 2023 (UTC)

Commons photographers: next virtual meeting on August 5

Dear member of the Commons Photographers User Group,

I'm inviting you to our next virtual meeting on Saturday, August 5th. We'll have two speakers: Poco a poco will provide us with an update on his underwater photography and George Oates from the Flickr Foundation will talk about the Flickr-to-Commons bridge (“Flickypedia”) that is currently in the works. If you're interested in attending, please sign up on this page: Virtual Meeting on August 5, 2023.

I hope you're having a great time taking photos and I'm looking forward to seeing you on August 5th.

All the best, --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 15:41, 20 July 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Arrival area at Indira Gandhi International Airport.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments I believe there is some CA in the lights that might need editing. -- Ikan Kekek 20:20, 16 July 2023 (UTC) @Ikan Kekek fixed, ok now?  Support Yes indeed. I'm impressed. -- Ikan Kekek 06:50, 18 July 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Running train,Serampore.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments It needs a perspective correction --Poco a poco 08:56, 9 July 2023 (UTC) @Poco a poco Is it ok now?--Wasiul Bahar 20:37, 15 July 2023 (UTC)  Support Yes, better --Poco a poco 17:29, 18 July 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 21 July 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Road sign at Hyatt Hyderabad Gachibowli.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Jakubhal 19:12, 19 July 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dhaka central jail 9.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 19:10, 19 July 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 22 July 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mausoleum of Three Leaders 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tagooty 02:16, 26 July 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 28 July 2023 (UTC)

Quick reminder: Commons Photographers meeting this Saturday

Dear member of the Commons Photographers User Group,

This is a quick reminder that our next meeting will happen on Saturday, August 5th. If you haven't registered yet and you're interested in learning more about underwater photography and “Flickypedia”, please sign up on this page. Also, I invite you to fill out this survey created by the people who are working on the Flickr-to-Wikimedia Commons software. Your input will make a difference.

We haven't had a virtual meeting in a while and I'm so looking forward to this weekend!

All the best, --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 02:15, 4 August 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Interior of air vistara flight 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments You should rotate it by 180 degrees --Poco a poco 21:39, 29 July 2023 (UTC) @Poco a poco Corrected Much better, what about some categories? --Poco a poco 20:29, 31 July 2023 (UTC) @Poco a poco categorize done.  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:57, 2 August 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 5 August 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Combination Padlock 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Would it be possible to centre the lock? --Аныл Озташ 00:11, 2 August 2023 (UTC) @Аныл Озташ Done.-Wasiul Bahar 05:18, 2 August 2023 (UTC) It could be sharpened a bit, but still has good quality. --Аныл Озташ 15:12, 3 August 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:37, 6 August 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Above the cloud from Air Vistara 24.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 7 August 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! JCB S1930E Scissor Lift at Rajiv Gandhi International Airport, hyderabad.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Thanks, it's better now. --Imehling 17:28, 8 August 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Police headquarters building 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Needs perspective correction --MB-one 20:08, 26 July 2023 (UTC) @MB-one Corrected-Wasiul Bahar 15:52, 2 August 2023 (UTC) Still leaning in. --MB-one 12:58, 6 August 2023 (UTC) @MB-one Ok now?--Wasiul Bahar 12:08, 8 August 2023 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --MB-one 21:07, 8 August 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 11 August 2023 (UTC)