User talk:King of Hearts

Old talk can be found at /Archive.

Welcome to the Commons, King of Hearts!

First steps tutorial Our first steps help file and our FAQ will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy. You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold contributing here and assume good faith for the intentions of others. This is a wiki - it is really easy. Getting help More information is available at the Community Portal. You may ask questions at the Help desk, Village Pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons. You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at Commons talk:Licensing.		Goodies, tips and tricks Put Babel boxes on your user page so others know what languages you can speak and indicate your Graphics abilities. All your uploads are stored in your personal Gallery Please sign your name on Talk pages by typing ~~~~ Use the CommonSense tool to find good categories for your files (then other people can find them too!) To link to an image page, write this: [[:Image:Foo.jpg]], it makes this: Image:Foo.jpg If you're copying files from another project, be sure to use the CommonsHelper Made a mistake? Did you want to rename or move a file? Simply upload the file again and mark the old one like this: {{bad name|Correct name}} For more information read the full Deletion guidelines
(P.S. Would you like to provide feedback on this message?)

Siebrand 21:27, 28 June 2006 (UTC)

Need your input on a policy impacting gadgets and UserJS

Dear interface administrator,

This is Samuel from the Security team and I hope my message finds you well.

There is an ongoing discussion on a proposed policy governing the use of external resources in gadgets and UserJS. The proposed Third-party resources policy aims at making the UserJS and Gadgets landscape a bit safer by encouraging best practices around external resources. After an initial non-public conversation with a small number of interface admins and staff, we've launched a much larger, public consultation to get a wider pool of feedback for improving the policy proposal. Based on the ideas received so far, the proposed policy now includes some of the risks related to user scripts and gadgets loading third-party resources, best practices for gadgets and UserJS developers, and exemptions requirements such as code transparency and inspectability.

As an interface administrator, your feedback and suggestions are warmly welcome until July 17, 2023 on the policy talk page.

Have a great day!

Samuel (WMF), on behalf of the Foundation's Security team 23:02, 7 July 2023 (UTC)

Translation notification: Commons:Deletion policy

Hello King of Hearts,

You are receiving this notification because you signed up as a translator to Spanish and Chinese on Wikimedia Commons. The page Commons:Deletion policy is available for translation. You can translate it here:

• translate to Spanish
• translate to Chinese

The priority of this page is high.

This is an important policy page, please assist to translate it into your language.

Your help is greatly appreciated. Translators like you help Wikimedia Commons to function as a truly multilingual community.

You can change your notification preferences.

Thank you!

Wikimedia Commons translation coordinators‎, 14:01, 9 July 2023 (UTC)

Input requested

Hi King of Hearts. What's your take on File:Carol Sklenicka signing her book - Raymond Carver-.jpg and File:Carol Sklenicka autographing her book -Raymond Carver-.jpg? There's a good chance that the uploader is the photographer who took the photos, and the photos don't seem to be being used anywhere else; however, the copyright claim in each file's EXIF data doesn't really seem to be inline with COM:L and the CC-by-sa-4.0 licenses the uploader has chosen. Do you think these should be VRT verified? In addition, since you're also an admin on English Wikipedia, I'm wondering whether you could take a look at the way the "autographing her book" photo is being attributed in en:Carol Sklenicka. It seems that the attribution on the file's page should be sufficient and it's not really necessary to dp so again in-article. -- Marchjuly (talk) 02:50, 11 July 2023 (UTC)

We don't really pay too much attention to copyright claims in the EXIF metadata, unless they imply that the uploader is likely not the photographer. For a photo credibly claimed to be own work, we don't ask for VRT unless it has been previously published. You're correct that we don't do inline attribution on Wikipedia. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 21:06, 11 July 2023 (UTC)

Potential copyright images uploaded to Commons

Hello King of Hearts. I have come across a number of photographs uploaded by Publiccorrectionsmdah on July 11 that appear to be copyright content from the Mississippi Department of Archives and History website or other copyright sources. In fact, the Metadata on some suspect photos show "All Rights Reserved" and "Copyright Tom Beck". Seems like an Administrator should look into this before more photos are uploaded to Commons. Regards. Woodlot (talk) 21:03, 11 July 2023 (UTC)

Based on their username, they are clearly claiming to be a representative of the Mississippi Department of Archives and History. I would ask them to verify their identity via VRT. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 21:08, 11 July 2023 (UTC)

File:Joan Elkin's Painting, Jarvis Thurston and His Circle.jpg

Hi KOA. Would you mind taking a look at File:Joan Elkin's Painting, Jarvis Thurston and His Circle.jpg? This seems to be a case of COM:2D copying unless the original painting has also been released under a CC license. The uploader appears to have gotten the artist’s consent. Do you think VRT verification is needed for this? — Marchjuly (talk) 21:49, 15 July 2023 (UTC)

Same uploader also uploaded File:Beers, Lorna Img001.jpg, File:Beers, Lorna Img002.jpg, File:Beers, Lorna Img004.jpg and File:Beers, Lorna Img003.jpg, which too appear to be a case of “2D copying”. The files state they have OTRS permission, but there are no ticket numbers and nothing else that indicates that an OTRS member reviewed the files. Finally, there are also File:Susan Stang in Italy in 2012. (Photo by Sam Stang.).jpg and File:Dr. Richard Stang in 1994..jpg which might need VRT verification, but I’m not sure. — Marchjuly (talk) 22:03, 15 July 2023 (UTC)

Yes, VRT is required whenever the uploader is not the author of 100% of the copyrightable content in the work and there is no public evidence of a free license. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 18:27, 17 July 2023 (UTC)

Thank you for looking at these. Do you think tagging them with {{Npd}} is sifficient? Would it be better to bring that all to DR? -- Marchjuly (talk) 04:25, 18 July 2023 (UTC)

Npd is easier, but for groups of related images it can be worth the few seconds to open a batch DR to ensure consistent handling. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 05:24, 18 July 2023 (UTC)

I started a DR about them at Commons:Deletion requests/Uploads by JayDivine. Feel free to cleanup any syntax errors I might've made. -- Marchjuly (talk) 01:28, 19 July 2023 (UTC)

I started the DR and the uploader joined the discussion. I tried to explain what I thought needed to be done and the uploader seemed to be in agreement and stated they were moving towards a resolution. I mistakenly assumed that meant, least in the case of File:Susan Stang in Italy in 2012. (Photo by Sam Stang.).jpg and File:Dr. Richard Stang in 1994..jpg, the person or persons who took the photos was going to email VRT. What it turned out to be was File:Susan Hacker Stang self-portrait.jpg and File:Richard Stang, 1994.jpg uploaded by Farefoto, an account that hadn't edited in more that 10 years who seems to claiming they're Susan Hacker Stang. If these are OK, then cool. If not, then maybe someone else needs to try and explain what needs to be done because I didn't seem to do a very good job.

This is similar to my interactions with the uploader about non-free content use and reliable sources at en:User talk:JayDivine#Book cover files in Carol Sklenicka. In that case, I tried to explain that business email correspondence between publishing house employees and the author of a book and internal emails between employees most likely wouldn't be considered to be a reliable source for Wikipedia purposes and probably should be being cited as such, or at would be primary sources at best with limited use. When I asked whether such "rudimentary personal correspondence" (their description of the sources, not mine) were published and accessible is some way for verification purposes, I got links to publishing house profiles instead saying that the individuals involved were "accessible". The end result was the adding additional citations to similar sources to the article to justify the book covers non-free uses. Since you're an admin on both English Wikipedia and Commons, maybe you could take a look at what was discussed in the DR and also on English Wikipedia. If everything is in order, then great and I'll just let things be. If not, then maybe another voice trying to explain what needs to be done will help clarify things. -- Marchjuly (talk) 20:58, 21 July 2023 (UTC)

Commons photographers: next virtual meeting on August 5

Dear member of the Commons Photographers User Group,

I'm inviting you to our next virtual meeting on Saturday, August 5th. We'll have two speakers: Poco a poco will provide us with an update on his underwater photography and George Oates from the Flickr Foundation will talk about the Flickr-to-Commons bridge (“Flickypedia”) that is currently in the works. If you're interested in attending, please sign up on this page: Virtual Meeting on August 5, 2023.

I hope you're having a great time taking photos and I'm looking forward to seeing you on August 5th.

All the best, --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 15:41, 20 July 2023 (UTC)

Reverted these edits

ResolvedSemi-resolved. File:Logo of Stanford University.png still up. --QuickQuokka ^{[⁠talk • contribs]} 21:03, 21 July 2023 (UTC)

I reverted this revision and this revision, becuase "Probably old enough" is not a copyright expiration. their website says the seal was designed in 2002 (not expired) QuickQuokka ^{[⁠talk • contribs]} 20:14, 21 July 2023 (UTC)

Also that deletion request is over 10 years old, that's quite outdated. QuickQuokka ^{[⁠talk • contribs]} 20:41, 21 July 2023 (UTC)

Pinging @Jcb, he made that decision on the deletion request over a decade ago, let's see if he still stands by it. QuickQuokka ^{[⁠talk • contribs]} 20:43, 21 July 2023 (UTC)

@QuickQuokka: Any file previously kept at DR is never eligible for speedy deletion, period. If you disagree with the decision, you should start a new DR. I've done so here: Commons:Deletion requests/File:Logo of Stanford University.png. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 21:41, 21 July 2023 (UTC)

@King of Hearts: Genuine question: Can you please link to that policy/guideline? Not trying to be passive aggressive I just genuinely had no idea.

But again, in my opinion, the first DR was invalid, but I'll add a comment on the new DR. QuickQuokka ^{[⁠talk • contribs]} 22:09, 21 July 2023 (UTC)

Per COM:CSD: "If a page has survived a prior deletion discussion, it should not be speedy deleted except for newly discovered copyright violations." As long as the previous DR discussed copyright issues, I don't think it would ever qualify as "newly discovered" even if new evidence is presented. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 00:46, 22 July 2023 (UTC)

Request block for Haryplg

Sir @King of Hearts, I requesting block for @Haryplg because he repeatedly upload many radio and television networks, channels and stations in Indonesia logos using any non-free files which potentially violating copyrights and intellectual property rights, just like this:

• https://commons.m.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Log&page=&subtype=&tagfilter=&type=upload&user=Haryplg&wpFormIdentifier=logeventslist&wpdate=&offset=&limit=500
• https://commons.m.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/Haryplg

Thanks..... 36.69.22.249 15:49, 27 July 2023 (UTC)

Request

King of Hearts, Hello, Please delete my file past version as my per request. Kind regards → คⅴīгค๓ ([ʆεt'ς tαʆƘ🇮🇳])← 04:40, 30 July 2023 (UTC)

Done. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 04:45, 30 July 2023 (UTC)

Kings of Hearts, Thanks :) → คⅴīгค๓ ([ʆεt'ς tαʆƘ🇮🇳])← 04:49, 30 July 2023 (UTC)

File

King of Hearts, Hello, I would like to ask you if you could restore this 19th century photograph to me, it is part of a private collection Please?? Ladrrionesius (talk) 15:29, 30 July 2023 (UTC)

Quick reminder: Commons Photographers meeting this Saturday

Dear member of the Commons Photographers User Group,

This is a quick reminder that our next meeting will happen on Saturday, August 5th. If you haven't registered yet and you're interested in learning more about underwater photography and “Flickypedia”, please sign up on this page. Also, I invite you to fill out this survey created by the people who are working on the Flickr-to-Wikimedia Commons software. Your input will make a difference.

We haven't had a virtual meeting in a while and I'm so looking forward to this weekend!

All the best, --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 02:15, 4 August 2023 (UTC)