Kroger Supermarket is the country's largest grocery store chain with over $90 billion in sales for the fiscal year of 2012.
Photo: iStock | JHVEPhoto

The United Food and Commercial Workers International Union (UFCW), representing thousands of associates working for Kroger and Safeway, has come out in clear opposition to the merger of the two grocery giants.

Marc Perrone, UFCW president, criticized the companies for failing to provide “any definite assurances” regarding the divestiture of stores and what that might mean for its members. The union is concerned that buyers for divested stores may be saddled with a burdensome level of debt that could put their viability at risk.

Haggen’s 2014 acquisition of 146 stores from Albertsons and Safeway remains fresh in the minds of grocery industry watchers. Haggen, an 18-store supermarket chain with stores in Oregon and Washington, acquired Albertsons and Safeway locations in Arizona, California and Las Vegas. Safeway acquired Haggen’s 29 stores in the Pacific Northwest. Today, 15 stores are operating under the Haggen banner.

The UFCW’s opposition to the merger of Kroger and Safeway is not unexpected and was likely prompted, at least in part, by an op-ed piece in the Cincinnati Enquirer from the CEOs of the two companies that addressed what they see as myths surrounding the deal.

Rodney McMullen of Kroger and Vivek Sankaran of Albertsons wrote that concerns about store closings or frontline employees losing their jobs were off-base.

“We are working closely with the regulators and are committed to finding reliable operators for the divested stores,” wrote the CEOs.

Messrs. McMullen and Sankaran also wrote, “No frontline workers will be laid off as a result of the merger. The combined company will be one of the largest unionized workforces in the country. We are committed to protecting and expanding opportunities for union jobs.”

The UFCW has been skeptical of the merger since it was announced last year. It released a statement in November that it “would oppose any merger that undermines the wages, jobs, benefits, and security of Kroger and Albertsons workers. We have repeatedly called on both Kroger and Albertsons to be fully transparent about this merger and to provide the information that every UFCW Local and member deserves. Our members have already sacrificed much over these many years, and they need to have a comprehensive understanding about what this deal means for them, their families, and the communities they serve.”

BrainTrust

“I assure you Kroger and Albertsons’ management are not even considering what happens if the deal doesn’t get done. This one has hubris written all over it.”

Gene Detroyer

Professor, International Business, Guizhou University of Finance & Economics and University of Sanya, China.


“Someone should torpedo it. For sure. Kroger is already huge.”

Paula Rosenblum

Co-founder, RSR Research


“[O]ne could argue they will be in a much better position once the deal goes through because then they will be able to threaten a national work stoppage.”

Ryan Mathews

Founder, CEO, Black Monk Consulting

Discussion Questions

DISCUSSION QUESTIONS: Will the UFCW’s opposition play a significant role in sinking the Kroger/Safeway merger? What will a failure to get the deal approved mean for Albertsons and Kroger?

Poll

How likely is UFCW opposition to sink the Kroger/Safeway merger deal?

View Results

Loading ... Loading …

Leave a Reply

17 responses to “Will The Union for Kroger and Safeway’s Workers Torpedo the Supermarket Giants’ Merger?”

  1. Paula Rosenblum Avatar
    Paula Rosenblum

    Someone should torpedo it. For sure. Kroger is already huge.

  2. Jeff Sward Avatar
    Jeff Sward

    A possible one-word justification for mergers is “efficiency.” Do more with less. The union has every right to be concerned about jobs. The companies talk about protecting frontline jobs, but almost certainly back office jobs are at risk. Mergers that create efficiencies through layoffs are not necessarily bad things. It’s totally natural within the retail evolutionary process. But the track record in grocery is a little messy.

  3. Gene Detroyer Avatar
    Gene Detroyer

    Let’s see if I understand. The speculation is that the government will force hundreds of stores to be divested. On top of that, Kroger and Albertsons will all close hundreds of overlapping stores.

    Indeed, do not worry. “No frontline workers will be laid off as a result of the merger.”

    I assure you Kroger and Albertsons’ management are not even considering what happens if the deal doesn’t get done. This one has hubris written all over it.

    1. storewanderer Avatar
      storewanderer

      The CEOs have promised no stores will close “as a result of the merger.”

      Emphasis on quotes.

      Stores open and close often for various reasons. Leases expire, buildings get damaged, etc. There will obviously be store closures post-merger so this promise of no stores closing “as a result of the merger” is rather reaching.

  4. Dr. Stephen Needel Avatar
    Dr. Stephen Needel

    I’m not sure if union opposition has ever played a role in preventing a merger — does anybody else know if this has happened? I’m assuming it does not play a role and you can bet the rent money that this will not end well for the union. I’m not opposed to it — everywhere else there are national grocery chains, so why not in the U.S.? And Walmart will keep a larger chain from acting like a monopoly.

  5. Neil Saunders Avatar
    Neil Saunders

    The union has a right to express its views, but they should hold no particular weight. Corporate deal-making and decisions cannot always be governed by what the unions want. And the unions don’t own the businesses nor are they significant investors in them.

    As for the union demanding assurances on divestments, this is an area outside of Kroger and Albertsons’ control as it is controlled by the FTC. However the union is right to be concerned because the FTC has a terrible track record on divestments — including Haggen, Rite Aid, Dollar Express, and so on. The FTC is not a particularly competent body and has a very theoretical approach to most things which rarely works out in practice.

    1. Paula Rosenblum Avatar
      Paula Rosenblum

      I don’t think the FTC will allow it, but then Kroger will argue that Walmart has a bigger share and Amazon will open stores.

      I still think it’s lousy.

      1. Neil Saunders Avatar
        Neil Saunders

        I have far fewer concerns. The UK grocery market is way more consolidated than the U.S. (the top five players have a much larger share). And the UK market is fiercely competitive, cut-throat on price, has better standards in-store, is more innovative and so forth, etc. So I don’t think consolidation is automatically bad or necessarily brings all bad things. And the point on Walmart is a good one: the combined entity still won’t have as much market share as the number 1 player.

  6. Ryan Mathews Avatar
    Ryan Mathews

    Full disclosure, in past incarnations I’ve worked closely with several unions and have spoken before UFCW audiences, although to be fair they didn’t listen to my advice. The fact that they object is not surprising, in fact not any more surprising than the fact that nobody at either chain is losing any sleep over their opposition. The only entity in position to break this deal is the FTC, and I doubt very much that they will block it. Unions are businesses that sell services in exchange for revenue in the form of dues. Obviously any action which potentially reduces the number of workers and/or their incomes is automatically seen as a threat to that revenue stream — and correctly so. But at the end of the day the UFCW isn’t in position to do much about it except complain. In fact, one could argue they will be in a much better position once the deal goes through because then they will be able to threaten a national work stoppage.

  7. storewanderer Avatar
    storewanderer

    There is a fair amount of opposition between the unions and various state attorneys general in states with heavy overlap.

    The union in my opinion is mostly falling back on the Haggen situation as to why this merger shouldn’t go through. While I agree that was a big deal, I think they need stronger, additional arguments.

    Kroger will be fine if the merger doesn’t go through. They are already in a very strong position.

    As for Albertsons, who paid out that giant special dividend and who has private equity owners controlling its shares who clearly want out and want a deal — I don’t know what will happen there if this deal doesn’t go through but something will happen.

    1. Craig Sundstrom Avatar
      Craig Sundstrom

      Maybe they’ll just stamp their feet and hold their (collective) breaths until they get what they want.
      It’s not 100% facetious. to say that, politically speaking, if you’re looking for stronger argument, pi**ing off ‘Private Equity’ may be it.

  8. George Anderson Avatar
    George Anderson

    A Kroger spokesperson issued the following statement in response to this piece:

    “Our proposed merger with Albertsons is about growing jobs and careers, and we expect the merger to create meaningful and measurable benefits for our associates. We will invest an additional $1 billion to increase wages and expand our industry-leading benefits starting on Day One following close, and we expect to provide new and exciting career growth opportunities for many associates. This commitment builds on our track record of supporting associates, including the incremental $1.9 billion we have invested in wages and comprehensive benefits since 2018. The Kroger Family of Companies is one of America’s largest unionized workforces and this merger also secures the long-term future of union jobs by establishing a more competitive alternative to large, non-union retailers.”

    1. Craig Sundstrom Avatar
      Craig Sundstrom

      By my math: $1B/~800,000 employees – denominator subject to change! – comes out to ~$1200/employee; (and we’ll also have to adjust for the share that goes to management.)
      I’ll leave it to others to decide if that’s meaningful.

  9. Craig Sundstrom Avatar
    Craig Sundstrom

    When did labor opposition ever sink a merger?? (no cheating: if you have to ‘google’ an answer, my point is made).
    That having been said, it’s not hard to see why they are objecting: controlling labor costs will most certainly be a permanent preoccupation of a combined company, and we agreed yesterday that assurance are largely meaningless; the bigger problem is the big picture: grocery is highly competitive and tho it does not, of course, face the (foreign) outsourcing issues that manufacturing does, unionized operators face competition from (often) lower cost non-unionized operators. Short term victory, long term defeat ? Cleanup in the Pyrrhic Victory aisle!

  10. David Biernbaum Avatar
    David Biernbaum

    While unions focus on wages, jobs, benefits, and worker security, they often overlook the long-term effects and impacts of their actions on businesses, and the fact that once the business erodes, there will be no more wages, jobs, benefits, or worker security, at least not in the companies they were working for.

  11. David Biernbaum Avatar
    David Biernbaum

    While unions concern themselves with wages, jobs, benefits, and security of workers, they often overlook one more factor: the long term health of the business itself, their employer.

    On some occasions, the demands of the union simply do not allow a retailer to continue its own business model, and that often leads to business erosion, decline, or not being in business anymore.

    When the business goes down, employees no longer have any wages, jobs, benefits, or securities, so “be careful what you ask for.”

    Regardless of rhetoric from Kroger and Albertsons-Safeway, the UFCW does have the direct or indirect power to get in the way of the merger. There is no doubt in my mind about that.

  12. George Anderson Avatar
    George Anderson

    An Albertsons spokesperson issued the following statement: “We have a rich history of creating quality jobs and working collaboratively alongside UFCW. Our proposed merger with Kroger will secure the long-term future of union jobs by establishing a more competitive alternative to large, non-union retailers. The combined company will also invest in associate wages, training, and benefits to ensure it is able to bring even more value to the customers and communities our associates so proudly serve.”

17 Comments
oldest
newest
Paula Rosenblum
Paula Rosenblum
3 months ago

Someone should torpedo it. For sure. Kroger is already huge.

Jeff Sward
Jeff Sward
3 months ago

A possible one-word justification for mergers is “efficiency.” Do more with less. The union has every right to be concerned about jobs. The companies talk about protecting frontline jobs, but almost certainly back office jobs are at risk. Mergers that create efficiencies through layoffs are not necessarily bad things. It’s totally natural within the retail evolutionary process. But the track record in grocery is a little messy.

Gene Detroyer
Gene Detroyer
3 months ago

Let’s see if I understand. The speculation is that the government will force hundreds of stores to be divested. On top of that, Kroger and Albertsons will all close hundreds of overlapping stores.

Indeed, do not worry. “No frontline workers will be laid off as a result of the merger.”

I assure you Kroger and Albertsons’ management are not even considering what happens if the deal doesn’t get done. This one has hubris written all over it.

storewanderer
storewanderer
  Gene Detroyer
3 months ago

The CEOs have promised no stores will close “as a result of the merger.”

Emphasis on quotes.

Stores open and close often for various reasons. Leases expire, buildings get damaged, etc. There will obviously be store closures post-merger so this promise of no stores closing “as a result of the merger” is rather reaching.

Dr. Stephen Needel
Dr. Stephen Needel
3 months ago

I’m not sure if union opposition has ever played a role in preventing a merger — does anybody else know if this has happened? I’m assuming it does not play a role and you can bet the rent money that this will not end well for the union. I’m not opposed to it — everywhere else there are national grocery chains, so why not in the U.S.? And Walmart will keep a larger chain from acting like a monopoly.

Neil Saunders
Neil Saunders
3 months ago

The union has a right to express its views, but they should hold no particular weight. Corporate deal-making and decisions cannot always be governed by what the unions want. And the unions don’t own the businesses nor are they significant investors in them.

As for the union demanding assurances on divestments, this is an area outside of Kroger and Albertsons’ control as it is controlled by the FTC. However the union is right to be concerned because the FTC has a terrible track record on divestments — including Haggen, Rite Aid, Dollar Express, and so on. The FTC is not a particularly competent body and has a very theoretical approach to most things which rarely works out in practice.

Paula Rosenblum
Paula Rosenblum
  Neil Saunders
3 months ago

I don’t think the FTC will allow it, but then Kroger will argue that Walmart has a bigger share and Amazon will open stores.

I still think it’s lousy.

Neil Saunders
Neil Saunders
  Paula Rosenblum
3 months ago

I have far fewer concerns. The UK grocery market is way more consolidated than the U.S. (the top five players have a much larger share). And the UK market is fiercely competitive, cut-throat on price, has better standards in-store, is more innovative and so forth, etc. So I don’t think consolidation is automatically bad or necessarily brings all bad things. And the point on Walmart is a good one: the combined entity still won’t have as much market share as the number 1 player.

Ryan Mathews
Ryan Mathews
3 months ago

Full disclosure, in past incarnations I’ve worked closely with several unions and have spoken before UFCW audiences, although to be fair they didn’t listen to my advice. The fact that they object is not surprising, in fact not any more surprising than the fact that nobody at either chain is losing any sleep over their opposition. The only entity in position to break this deal is the FTC, and I doubt very much that they will block it. Unions are businesses that sell services in exchange for revenue in the form of dues. Obviously any action which potentially reduces the number of workers and/or their incomes is automatically seen as a threat to that revenue stream — and correctly so. But at the end of the day the UFCW isn’t in position to do much about it except complain. In fact, one could argue they will be in a much better position once the deal goes through because then they will be able to threaten a national work stoppage.

storewanderer
storewanderer
3 months ago

There is a fair amount of opposition between the unions and various state attorneys general in states with heavy overlap.

The union in my opinion is mostly falling back on the Haggen situation as to why this merger shouldn’t go through. While I agree that was a big deal, I think they need stronger, additional arguments.

Kroger will be fine if the merger doesn’t go through. They are already in a very strong position.

As for Albertsons, who paid out that giant special dividend and who has private equity owners controlling its shares who clearly want out and want a deal — I don’t know what will happen there if this deal doesn’t go through but something will happen.

Craig Sundstrom
Craig Sundstrom
  storewanderer
3 months ago

Maybe they’ll just stamp their feet and hold their (collective) breaths until they get what they want.
It’s not 100% facetious. to say that, politically speaking, if you’re looking for stronger argument, pi**ing off ‘Private Equity’ may be it.

George Anderson
George Anderson
3 months ago

A Kroger spokesperson issued the following statement in response to this piece:

“Our proposed merger with Albertsons is about growing jobs and careers, and we expect the merger to create meaningful and measurable benefits for our associates. We will invest an additional $1 billion to increase wages and expand our industry-leading benefits starting on Day One following close, and we expect to provide new and exciting career growth opportunities for many associates. This commitment builds on our track record of supporting associates, including the incremental $1.9 billion we have invested in wages and comprehensive benefits since 2018. The Kroger Family of Companies is one of America’s largest unionized workforces and this merger also secures the long-term future of union jobs by establishing a more competitive alternative to large, non-union retailers.”

Craig Sundstrom
Craig Sundstrom
  George Anderson
3 months ago

By my math: $1B/~800,000 employees – denominator subject to change! – comes out to ~$1200/employee; (and we’ll also have to adjust for the share that goes to management.)
I’ll leave it to others to decide if that’s meaningful.

Craig Sundstrom
Craig Sundstrom
3 months ago

When did labor opposition ever sink a merger?? (no cheating: if you have to ‘google’ an answer, my point is made).
That having been said, it’s not hard to see why they are objecting: controlling labor costs will most certainly be a permanent preoccupation of a combined company, and we agreed yesterday that assurance are largely meaningless; the bigger problem is the big picture: grocery is highly competitive and tho it does not, of course, face the (foreign) outsourcing issues that manufacturing does, unionized operators face competition from (often) lower cost non-unionized operators. Short term victory, long term defeat ? Cleanup in the Pyrrhic Victory aisle!

David Biernbaum
David Biernbaum
3 months ago

While unions focus on wages, jobs, benefits, and worker security, they often overlook the long-term effects and impacts of their actions on businesses, and the fact that once the business erodes, there will be no more wages, jobs, benefits, or worker security, at least not in the companies they were working for.

David Biernbaum
David Biernbaum
3 months ago

While unions concern themselves with wages, jobs, benefits, and security of workers, they often overlook one more factor: the long term health of the business itself, their employer.

On some occasions, the demands of the union simply do not allow a retailer to continue its own business model, and that often leads to business erosion, decline, or not being in business anymore.

When the business goes down, employees no longer have any wages, jobs, benefits, or securities, so “be careful what you ask for.”

Regardless of rhetoric from Kroger and Albertsons-Safeway, the UFCW does have the direct or indirect power to get in the way of the merger. There is no doubt in my mind about that.

George Anderson
George Anderson
3 months ago

An Albertsons spokesperson issued the following statement: “We have a rich history of creating quality jobs and working collaboratively alongside UFCW. Our proposed merger with Kroger will secure the long-term future of union jobs by establishing a more competitive alternative to large, non-union retailers. The combined company will also invest in associate wages, training, and benefits to ensure it is able to bring even more value to the customers and communities our associates so proudly serve.”