The Anheuser-Busch Washingtons Birthday Parade, Close up of the Bud Light Logo
Photo: iStock | Roberto Galan

College marketing classes in the future may use Bud Light as a case study on how to take a bad business situation and make it even worse.

Bud Light’s year-over-year sales have fallen 11 percent this year, according to data from Bump Williams Consulting. Kid Rock and others have made the brand a scapegoat in the culture wars for including Dylan Mulvaney, a transgender woman, activist, actress and influencer celebrating her transition, in its inclusive social media marketing efforts.

Anheuser-Busch CEO Brendan Whitworth last month said the brewer regretted the tumult caused by its marketing campaign. “We never intended to be part of a discussion that divides people,” he said. “We are in the business of bringing people together over a beer.”

The company then halted the campaign and put the executives in charge, including Alissa Heinerscheid, vice president of marketing at Bud Light, on leave.

This action, in turn, produced outrage on the part of the LGBTQ community along with others who questioned how Kid Rock, who refused to perform at venues during the novel coronavirus pandemic if they required concertgoers to be vaccinated and/or wear a mask, could get a brand to walk away from corporate values expressed over decades. Bud Light has partnered with GLAAD (formerly the Gay & Lesbian Alliance Against Defamation) for over 20 years.

Ms. Heinerscheid, vice president of marketing at Bud Light, speaking last month on the Make Yourself at Home podcast before the protests began, said the brand was the top-selling beer in the U.S., but its sales have “been in decline for a really long time.”

Bud Light has seen consumption fall among young adults, primarily in urban areas, who have chosen Mexican beers and other alcoholic and non-alcoholic beverage alternatives.

Ms. Heinerscheid and the marketing team behind the beer brand have sought to widen its audience by eschewing frat-boy humor in its commercials and highlighting women, including Super Bowl spots that featured recording star, Lilith Fair co-founder and animal activist Sara McLachlan and Keleigh Sperry, actress and wife of Miles Teller.

“I’m not going to pretend that there isn’t so much more work to do from a business result perspective and, of course, a representation perspective, but I feel like you you have to put your money where your mouth is when you’re trying to evolve a brand and elevate it and bring in new consumers,” Ms. Heinerscheid said.

BrainTrust

“Marketers are not in the business of picking a side, they are in the business of selling their product. The sooner they learn that, the better off they’ll be.”

Dr. Stephen Needel

Managing Partner, Advanced Simulations


“It’s 1950 again in America. The question is whether brands will think that’s a good thing.”

Cathy Hotka

Principal, Cathy Hotka & Associates


“This was a colossal mistake that will go down in the annals of time as one of the biggest marketing failures in American business.”

David Spear

VP, Professional Services, Retail, NCR

Discussion Questions

DISCUSSION QUESTION: What brand marketing lessons can be learned from Bud Light’s inclusivity messaging and its parent company’s reaction in the face of criticism?

Poll

Where did Bud Light make the bigger marketing mistake?

View Results

Loading ... Loading …

Leave a Reply

18 responses to “Did Anheuser-Busch Take a Sad Bud Light Song And Make It Sadder?”

  1. Dion Kenney Avatar
    Dion Kenney

    Prior to this social media dustup, I hadn’t heard Bud Light mentioned in years. Perhaps there’s some truth to the old chestnut “No such thing as bad publicity”

  2. Cathy Hotka Avatar
    Cathy Hotka

    It’s 1950 again in America. The question is whether brands will think that’s a good thing.

    1. Bob Phibbs Avatar
      Bob Phibbs

      Truly sad but accurate Cathy.

  3. Dr. Stephen Needel Avatar
    Dr. Stephen Needel

    Joining a long list of brands that have tried to capitalize on DEI and have failed. Why, because it’s beer, not a message board. Any social issue we have today has at least two sides. Marketers are not in the business of picking a side, they are in the business of selling their product. The sooner they learn that, the better off they’ll be.

  4. Gary Sankary Avatar
    Gary Sankary

    Sadly the polarization of our society has a way of creeping into business. Consumer-facing companies have a very difficult line to walk. Consumers identify with brands that align with their values. That includes their personal politics. This isn’t new, we’ve seen major consumer brands boycotted for business practices that offend one side of the spectrum or another. As we’ve become more polarized as a society in recent years, the tripwires that set people off have become more complicated, and actions that elicit responses from one side or the other are more acute. Add instant amplification on social media, and you have a situation that Bud Light has been navigating. They’re now in a no-win situation. By suggesting that supporting Ms. Mulveny was a mistake, they’ve, in effect, discounted her and her community, and the idea that they just want to get people together to “have a beer” rings hollow. In the meantime, their detractors have gotten so much attention blowing up cases of Bud Light they’re not likely to stop just because the company has tried to reverse its course on this.

  5. Gene Detroyer Avatar
    Gene Detroyer

    The lesson: If you spend decades developing a specific demographic, know intimately what that demographic thinks about the world.

    Anybody reading today’s discussion can search beer demographics and know Bud Light should not touch any social issue.

  6. Rich Kizer Avatar
    Rich Kizer

    Doesn’t this just smack with the wisdom we should all follow in our advertising ventures? Choose a company has a little more common sense rather than one who thinks ideas should be cool?

  7. Lisa Goller Avatar
    Lisa Goller

    Despite decades of LGBTQ allyship, Bud Light’s campaign was a radical departure for the brand.

    Brand marketing lessons include:

    • Know your audience: Your core market may resent change rather than celebrate it.
    • Honor your brand essence: Avoid controversy as a marketing gimmick, as divisive issues can alienate consumers if these issues do not align with your brand’s legacy.
    • Know your rivals: The sober movement and rise in innovative substitutes demand strategic discernment, as missteps are costly.

  8. David Spear Avatar
    David Spear

    KNOW THY AUDIENCE.

    Hmm, how difficult was it for senior executives at AB to look at their current Bud Light audience, which is incredibly LOYAL and evangelists for the brand, and figure out that 99% of them would likely be opposed to the new marketing campaign? This was a colossal mistake that will go down in the annals of time as one of the biggest marketing failures in American business.

    1. Gary Sankary Avatar
      Gary Sankary

      99%? Maybe 5% who are vocal and angry. Bud Light has done a great job marketing to LGBTQ community. There are a lot a Gay bars in this country. Now they’ve alienated all of them.

  9. Ryan Mathews Avatar
    Ryan Mathews

    There is, as we philosophers like to say, a prior question here.

    How much of Bud Light’s decline can be directly linked to the inclusivity campaign? My guess? Less than anyone wants to admit.

    Bud Light came of age in a different age — no microbreweries, no treating and talking about beer as if it were wine, more and larger parties, and no legal marijuana. It was a great success story, but very few stories outlive their times, and every beverage has its season.

    Now, if we want to focus on the inclusivity messaging the marketing lesson is that if you hold a really big target over your head and wave it until your arms fall off somebody — in fact, many somebodies — are going to take a shot at you. In a highly polarized society you can’t win by provocation. Either the “Woke Folk” will find something wrong with your messaging to prove it really isn’t inclusive enough or the QAnon Crowd will, as in the case of Kid Rock, literally use your brand for target practice. Increasingly, both things will happen.

    Brands face tough choices today. They can either take a position on social and cultural issues because they believe in it or they think enough of their addressable market believes in it, or they can stick their heads in the political – in the broadest sense – of the word – sand.

    1. Gary Sankary Avatar
      Gary Sankary

      Excellent point. AB has been actively buying craft breweries because that’s where the market has been going. Bud Light has been in decline for a long time.

  10. Allison McGuire Avatar
    Allison McGuire

    Did they partner with Dylan because she was a fan of Bud Light and the partnership was organic, or was the collaboration just a way to check off a box for inclusivity within Anheuser-Busch? If it was the former, Bud Light should stand behind their choices and not reprimand it’s employees.

  11. Craig Sundstrom Avatar
    Craig Sundstrom

    Altho most of the controversy has focused on Mulvaney’s identity as a person,, I would focus instead on the identification as an “influencer”(a concept which those familiar with my posts will know I have no love for.)
    Couple that with “activist”, and the red flags are waving pretty strongly.
    So am I saying companies should shy away from controversial figures??
    Not exactly, but I am saying there’s a risk of the controversy upstaging your product.

  12. Mark Self Avatar
    Mark Self

    Okay. The beer is…awful. And then you put out a campaign that is well intentioned (I am going with that) but tone deaf to actual Bud Light customers and potential customers.

    So, a bad product combined with bad messaging and you have a social media firestorm, PLUS sales going down by, last time I checked, 23%.

    So, maybe the lesson learned is, in my view making sure you continue to understand your market and serve that market. Just my view.

  13. Christopher P. Ramey Avatar
    Christopher P. Ramey

    AB lists over 20 brands in its portfolio. Each should have its own brand story and clientele it targets. To undermine its most valuable and largest brand is treason.

    The 1950s comment reminds me of David Ogilvy’s quote “The consumer isn’t a moron; she is your wife.” Executives at AB apparently thought otherwise.

  14. AlanAlexander Avatar
    AlanAlexander

    Yes, each and every A-B action has made the situation worse.
    1. Someone at A-B should have recognized right from the start that this Dylan Mulvaney influencer effort could be a disaster. I imagine that at least 40% of Bud Light core customers consider Mulvaney a fraud. Clearly, not enough people at HQ in either NYC or Belgium knows the customer.
    2. The video of the Marketing Director set this on fire. She had no consideration for current core customers in her comments. In fact, the comments indicated that she looked down on core customers, calling the history of the brand “fratty, with out of touch humor”. She also came across that she was smarter than everyone else.
    3. The Brazilian born CEO’s dismissive comments has added even more fuel to the fire. He characterized this entire episode as “one can, and not a campaign”, and stating that there is a lot of “misinformation”. This too can be interpreted as an insult to vote customers. In essence, current customers are “too stupid to recognize that this is not a campaign” and “we’ll fix this by increasing our ad spending by 3x.”
    We will see where this goes by Memorial Day. But if Bud Light continues to be down by -25% and A-B sales continue down by -12%, the entire executive team may need to be replaced by people who know and understand the current core customer. By the way, moving HQ back to St. Louis would be a smart move as well.

  15. Rich Kizer Avatar
    Rich Kizer

    I have never seen advantage in pondering campaigns that separate people. Never.

18 Comments
oldest
newest
Dion Kenney
Dion Kenney
2 months ago

Prior to this social media dustup, I hadn’t heard Bud Light mentioned in years. Perhaps there’s some truth to the old chestnut “No such thing as bad publicity”

Cathy Hotka
Cathy Hotka
2 months ago

It’s 1950 again in America. The question is whether brands will think that’s a good thing.

Bob Phibbs
Bob Phibbs
  Cathy Hotka
2 months ago

Truly sad but accurate Cathy.

Dr. Stephen Needel
Dr. Stephen Needel
2 months ago

Joining a long list of brands that have tried to capitalize on DEI and have failed. Why, because it’s beer, not a message board. Any social issue we have today has at least two sides. Marketers are not in the business of picking a side, they are in the business of selling their product. The sooner they learn that, the better off they’ll be.

Gary Sankary
Gary Sankary
2 months ago

Sadly the polarization of our society has a way of creeping into business. Consumer-facing companies have a very difficult line to walk. Consumers identify with brands that align with their values. That includes their personal politics. This isn’t new, we’ve seen major consumer brands boycotted for business practices that offend one side of the spectrum or another. As we’ve become more polarized as a society in recent years, the tripwires that set people off have become more complicated, and actions that elicit responses from one side or the other are more acute. Add instant amplification on social media, and you have a situation that Bud Light has been navigating. They’re now in a no-win situation. By suggesting that supporting Ms. Mulveny was a mistake, they’ve, in effect, discounted her and her community, and the idea that they just want to get people together to “have a beer” rings hollow. In the meantime, their detractors have gotten so much attention blowing up cases of Bud Light they’re not likely to stop just because the company has tried to reverse its course on this.

Gene Detroyer
Gene Detroyer
2 months ago

The lesson: If you spend decades developing a specific demographic, know intimately what that demographic thinks about the world.

Anybody reading today’s discussion can search beer demographics and know Bud Light should not touch any social issue.

Rich Kizer
Rich Kizer
2 months ago

Doesn’t this just smack with the wisdom we should all follow in our advertising ventures? Choose a company has a little more common sense rather than one who thinks ideas should be cool?

Lisa Goller
Lisa Goller
2 months ago

Despite decades of LGBTQ allyship, Bud Light’s campaign was a radical departure for the brand.

Brand marketing lessons include:

• Know your audience: Your core market may resent change rather than celebrate it.
• Honor your brand essence: Avoid controversy as a marketing gimmick, as divisive issues can alienate consumers if these issues do not align with your brand’s legacy.
• Know your rivals: The sober movement and rise in innovative substitutes demand strategic discernment, as missteps are costly.

David Spear
David Spear
2 months ago

KNOW THY AUDIENCE.

Hmm, how difficult was it for senior executives at AB to look at their current Bud Light audience, which is incredibly LOYAL and evangelists for the brand, and figure out that 99% of them would likely be opposed to the new marketing campaign? This was a colossal mistake that will go down in the annals of time as one of the biggest marketing failures in American business.

Gary Sankary
Gary Sankary
  David Spear
2 months ago

99%? Maybe 5% who are vocal and angry. Bud Light has done a great job marketing to LGBTQ community. There are a lot a Gay bars in this country. Now they’ve alienated all of them.

Ryan Mathews
Ryan Mathews
2 months ago

There is, as we philosophers like to say, a prior question here.

How much of Bud Light’s decline can be directly linked to the inclusivity campaign? My guess? Less than anyone wants to admit.

Bud Light came of age in a different age — no microbreweries, no treating and talking about beer as if it were wine, more and larger parties, and no legal marijuana. It was a great success story, but very few stories outlive their times, and every beverage has its season.

Now, if we want to focus on the inclusivity messaging the marketing lesson is that if you hold a really big target over your head and wave it until your arms fall off somebody — in fact, many somebodies — are going to take a shot at you. In a highly polarized society you can’t win by provocation. Either the “Woke Folk” will find something wrong with your messaging to prove it really isn’t inclusive enough or the QAnon Crowd will, as in the case of Kid Rock, literally use your brand for target practice. Increasingly, both things will happen.

Brands face tough choices today. They can either take a position on social and cultural issues because they believe in it or they think enough of their addressable market believes in it, or they can stick their heads in the political – in the broadest sense – of the word – sand.

Gary Sankary
Gary Sankary
  Ryan Mathews
2 months ago

Excellent point. AB has been actively buying craft breweries because that’s where the market has been going. Bud Light has been in decline for a long time.

Allison McGuire
Allison McGuire
2 months ago

Did they partner with Dylan because she was a fan of Bud Light and the partnership was organic, or was the collaboration just a way to check off a box for inclusivity within Anheuser-Busch? If it was the former, Bud Light should stand behind their choices and not reprimand it’s employees.

Craig Sundstrom
Craig Sundstrom
2 months ago

Altho most of the controversy has focused on Mulvaney’s identity as a person,, I would focus instead on the identification as an “influencer”(a concept which those familiar with my posts will know I have no love for.)
Couple that with “activist”, and the red flags are waving pretty strongly.
So am I saying companies should shy away from controversial figures??
Not exactly, but I am saying there’s a risk of the controversy upstaging your product.

Mark Self
Mark Self
2 months ago

Okay. The beer is…awful. And then you put out a campaign that is well intentioned (I am going with that) but tone deaf to actual Bud Light customers and potential customers.

So, a bad product combined with bad messaging and you have a social media firestorm, PLUS sales going down by, last time I checked, 23%.

So, maybe the lesson learned is, in my view making sure you continue to understand your market and serve that market. Just my view.

Christopher P. Ramey
Christopher P. Ramey
2 months ago

AB lists over 20 brands in its portfolio. Each should have its own brand story and clientele it targets. To undermine its most valuable and largest brand is treason.

The 1950s comment reminds me of David Ogilvy’s quote “The consumer isn’t a moron; she is your wife.” Executives at AB apparently thought otherwise.

AlanAlexander
AlanAlexander
2 months ago

Yes, each and every A-B action has made the situation worse.
1. Someone at A-B should have recognized right from the start that this Dylan Mulvaney influencer effort could be a disaster. I imagine that at least 40% of Bud Light core customers consider Mulvaney a fraud. Clearly, not enough people at HQ in either NYC or Belgium knows the customer.
2. The video of the Marketing Director set this on fire. She had no consideration for current core customers in her comments. In fact, the comments indicated that she looked down on core customers, calling the history of the brand “fratty, with out of touch humor”. She also came across that she was smarter than everyone else.
3. The Brazilian born CEO’s dismissive comments has added even more fuel to the fire. He characterized this entire episode as “one can, and not a campaign”, and stating that there is a lot of “misinformation”. This too can be interpreted as an insult to vote customers. In essence, current customers are “too stupid to recognize that this is not a campaign” and “we’ll fix this by increasing our ad spending by 3x.”
We will see where this goes by Memorial Day. But if Bud Light continues to be down by -25% and A-B sales continue down by -12%, the entire executive team may need to be replaced by people who know and understand the current core customer. By the way, moving HQ back to St. Louis would be a smart move as well.

Rich Kizer
Rich Kizer
2 months ago

I have never seen advantage in pondering campaigns that separate people. Never.