Commons talk:Threshold of originality

Archives Archive 1 Archive 2

Is (free) licence of this file right?

File:SpongeBob SquarePants logo.svg 10x for your answers.·Carn 12:40, 19 May 2020 (UTC) File:1447843795totallyspies6logo(1).png - I have concerns about this too.·Carn 12:43, 19 May 2020 (UTC)

This is not the right place; take it to Commons:Village Pump/Copyright.--Prosfilaes (talk) 22:49, 19 May 2020 (UTC)

Pakistan

Please also include the TOO of Pakistan. Following is the official copyright law in Pakistan;

• Copyright (Amendment) Ordinance, 2000

--Wildhorse3 (talk) 20:04, 27 May 2021 (UTC)

TOO in Czechia

Hi. I came across Commons:Copyright rules by territory/Czech Republic#Threshold of originality and to be honest, I'm not quite smarter learning what it says:

The work must be "a unique outcome of the creative activity of the author".^{[121/2000–2006 Art.2(1)]} For photographs and computer programs, it suffices if the work "is original in the sense that it is the author’s own intellectual creation".^{[121/2000–2006 Art.2(2)]}

So how am I supposed to understand this statement? That there is no distinctive threshold of originality taken into consideration and if the work is officially registered in intelectual property of copyright holder, then copyright is therefore applicable? How does one determine if such work is even eligible for intelectual property? Don't you guys just love law clausules that basically tell nothing and therefore pose some issues regarding copyright protection?

Please, can someone enlighten me redargind this statement? Is it really saying something that could be somehow useful for determining copyright status of a work or is it just some general statement that hides the true meaning somewhere else? Polda18 (discussion • contributions) 09:15, 15 March 2022 (UTC)

Broken references

I noted that there are plenty of broken reference links (31). This probably happens due to the different referencing system, so when the country entry is transcluded by {{TOO Country}} the same cannot be said also for the corresponding references, grouped together with {{Reflist|refs=}}. --ZandDev (talk) 23:08, 13 November 2022 (UTC)

Infographic showing "GIMP"

The infographic claims that the GIMP in its distinctive type face is not protected by copyright anywhere. I am not expert on the UK law, but it has a special copyright for typography that we honor. I think that the distinctive type face is probably protected there. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:05, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

Golang history in a diagram

Does the image [1] meet the threshold of originality? --D6194c-1cc (talk) 09:02, 24 December 2022 (UTC)

Graph on fibres intake and diseases

Does this graph https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(18)31809-9/fulltext#gr1 meet the threshold of originality? By browsing previous cases I would say no, but I'd like to know what other users think. Sette-quattro (talk) 13:45, 11 January 2023 (UTC)

Commons:Deletion requests/Template:PD-automated

Please see: Commons:Deletion requests/Template:PD-automated. --Timeshifter (talk) 07:34, 7 April 2023 (UTC)